|
|
A tantalizing Mystery remains in all of this- why
Cydonia? Sorry, I do not
have a simple answer as of yet as to why that locale on Mars has so many
apparent links with Earth. It might turn out to be just another
contrivance, a utilization of a
place-name which happened to occur
often in suitable Earth references to help manufacture the new,
improved cover story. There seems to be something more, however. In some
way, Cydonia is special. No one has turned up any ancient
references linking the name Cydonia with any extraterrestrial anything.
The Biblical reference to Sidon does not have any space-related
component, unless you tie it in somehow with Baalbek, home of the huge
stone platform Zechariah Sitchin says was used as a spaceport. As
it happens, there is a clear link between Sidon and
Cydonia.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
If
your favorite location for Cydonia isn't on this map, don't
fret- the on-line map shows a "Kydonia" at the
position of Kirtomados (a little bit east of Loutraki on the
above). I think that's a mistake, but many towns have multiple
names on Crete- or, someone might be looking for tourist
business. |
|
Said to have been founded by Sidon, grandson of Noah,
the city-state of Cydonia was the parent city of
Sidon, which was the parent to Tyre, which became the most
famous of the three, home to the Phoenicians, who were a mixture (genetic and cultural)
of Greek and Minoan. One of the wives of Solomon was a Sidonian
named Jezebel
(yes, that's her) who "tempted him" with the "idolatrous ways" of the Minoan culture.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
One
of Sitchin's Annunaki - or the Artist Formerly Known as Prince,
one of the two. |
|
With or
without the Annunaki, that
seems to be the oldest mention of the name in any form. Of course, a
Biblical reference is pretty old. It is possible
that other references were expunged from the historical record as part of
some long-ago political or religious revisionism, but it is rather
difficult to prove such a claim. When you factor in the various
spellings, Kydonia,
Cydonia,
Sidon,
Saïdon,
even Zidon, the number of possible arguments for links
expands. Hania comes from
Canea, which comes from
Canaan:
"The sons of
Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Ham was
the father of Canaan ... Canaan became the father
of Sidon his first-born ... And
the territory of the Canaanites extended from Sidon, in the direction of
Gerar, as far as Gaza, and in the direction of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah,
and Zeboiim, as far as Lasha."
Genesis 9:18 10:15,19 RSV
In spite of that reference, the proto-Semitic root word
sayd ("fishing"), is cited by some linguists as the likely origin of the city name.
Hmm. That would be very old indeed, and the Phoenicians
were sometimes referred to by contemporaries as "the Fishermen"
...but you see how that goes. You can easily generate a derivational chain which will be quite valid, but not automatically true. So I am not sure about the name source.
|
|
|
 |
Two
coins from Kydonia. The lower one is a hemidrachma. I
presume the one at top is a different denomination..
That is a sea turtle,
not a hand grenade or pineapple I don't know the exchange rate,
nor what the detail on the reverse means.
c. 455-450 BCE |
|
|
|
|
|
There are some clues, however, indicating reasons for a possible specific Insider interest in the place, which you've already seen , in the previous Baalbek images.
You just didn't realize it- all that subtle face-related decoration of the stones is a dead giveaway. That trait is the tangible Fingerprints of the Old Culture, (with a nod to
Graham Hancock), but it is part of what we are conditioned to ignore. "Don't look
there... look Here, where we're pointing!"
In any event, Cydonia became the new star of the
Conspiracy. That discovery of a “Face” on the Viking image was more
than a GIF, it was a gift. Sorry. I could not get through an entire
website without at least one pun. Anyway, whether orchestrated or
accidental, that strangely compelling visage, as I said at the
beginning, drew more public interest than anything NASA had ever
experienced before. One might think that the executives at NASA would
have seized upon this as an opportunity to secure funding for new
missions, but instead, they disparaged any who saw a Face there. They
called it merely a result of “tricks of light and shadow”. See a
pattern here? Present a picture of something blatantly artificial in
appearance, and then call it an illusion. Something you knew could be
shown to have been misinterpreted- because you
made it up. This was to insure that any other obviously
artificial things which might be noticed by the public could be
discounted as nothing but more illusions, misperceptions by the
unsophisticated who did not understand how to interpret the
“special” imagery from the Mars cameras.
There was a good reason the Face was chosen for
this role. It is not a typical Martian Face. The true shape of the
structure was
distorted by perspective , and in combination with the
"standard" contrast reversal, the result was uniquely flat. This
unintended circumstance permitted a description
as a “mesa”, when it actually is built out of the side of a
terraced hillside. Naturally, for genuine analysis, you would want to
observe from the low side so as to see as much interior detail as
possible. Yet so effective was the subtle sales job of the deception
that Face aficionados complained whenever
a new image was released unless it was displayed with a vertical
orientation. Rotated left from the proper aspect, in other words.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
MGS
R0700989 |
|
|
|
|
You may have noticed by now that the Face is neither the largest nor the most
unusual structure in the Cydonia area. The one singular distinction it
has is this: it’s really wrecked. Other
local structures are of course collapsed, eroded, and
more what a
developer would call “scrapers” than “fixer-uppers” due to age
and circumstances, but the Face looks like it might have
intentionally been bashed, smashed, and trashed. If
that impression is correct, it might mean something.
It might seem odd that once the idea had been
planted and the case established for discrediting any claimed
discoveries of artificiality anywhere else, that NASA would continue to
photograph the “meaningless” location. But that was necessary. The
real goal was to make any serious amateurs obsess on the Face.
The notion had to be nurtured that Cydonia was the hottest hot spot on
all of Mars, the biggest and best chance to prove NASA was Hiding
Something. Big bad NASA would do anything to hide this “smoking
gun”, and it was worth any effort to try and trip them up.
Gotcha, Suckers. The Conspiracy knew that if enough people
started looking at the rest of the planet, inevitably someone would find
some other blatant, inexplicable feature, and then it would happen
again, and then again. It was easy to disparage one “anomaly”, but
if they did not limit the focus of attention to a small number of areas,
eventually there would be so many anomalies to explain away that the whole cover-up
would collapse under tons of absurdity.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Just
to ensure that everyone had confusion to spare, the raw versions
of images sometimes vary from the posted ones in the archives.
This was the last Face image taken by the MGS. As you can see,
the same data yielded quite a different perspective
view. How is one to know which is the more accurate? You
can enhance a picture taken at an angle without problems, but if
the picture has been incorrectly distorted to simulate a
different perspective, that will affect the results of further
processing. The "low angle" one on the right
seems to be the original. After all, why would they distort it
like that if the other was the uncorrected source? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
click HERE
for a bigger version |
|
|
Enhancement
of that low-angle image, however, yields this. At higher
resolution, it gets even more interesting. The problem is, it
doesn't look like any of the other Cydonia images. Is this
actually a glimpse of a parallel-world Cydonia? Maybe they
finally found the filter combination which could manage to
reveal what they had been seeking. Before you dismiss it, study
it for a while without thinking of the "familiar"
details. Maybe this is the accurate one? It does indeed
look like many other Mars images, just not like other
Cydonia ones. See how confusing it is, when things won't hold
still ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As long as they could continue
to trot out the Face as the prime example of how silly the anomaly
seekers were, there would be few who would take other claims of
“discoveries” seriously. There would be no pandemic of
understanding. So they continued to put on a dour expression of
resignation and take more images of the notorious Face.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
A
little corner of the Inca City area We will take a
better look later... |
|
|
|
|
|
There were even a few backup targets. An area half
a world away from Cydonia was labeled Inca City by those cataloguing the
Mariner 9 images because it resembles the ragged grid layout of Macchu
Pichu. Of course, any Medieval village would look about the same from
the air, but the NASA insiders knew it really did have Incan detail. And
since anyone could plainly see the curved grid, it was pointless to try
and ignore it. So it was another opportunity to hide the truth in plain
sight, and draw more attention safely away from any dangerous free range
analysis.. We’ll take a look there, too. Next up, however, is the
explanation which eluded the oh-so-smart Conspirators for 50 years.
|
|
|
|
|